A batch of 600 Bitcoin mined in March 2010 has moved after more than 16 years of dormancy, drawing attention across the crypto market and reigniting speculation about the identity of the early miner behind the coins.
The 600 BTC moved after 16 years across 12 separate mining rewards and was worth approximately $48 million at the time of the transfers, according to on-chain data reviewed by Cointelegraph.
However, despite the coins dating back to Bitcoin’s earliest years, blockchain tracking platform Whale Alert said its analysis found no connection between the 12 mining rewards and Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto.
The movement therefore offers a fascinating glimpse into Bitcoin’s early mining era without providing evidence that Satoshi himself has moved coins.
600 BTC Moved After 16 Years From 2010 Mining Rewards
Whale Alert traced the 600 BTC to 12 Bitcoin blocks mined in March 2010.
At the time, Bitcoin miners received a 50 BTC block subsidy for successfully mining each block. Twelve such rewards therefore accounted for the 600 BTC that eventually moved.
Bitcoin’s mining economics have changed dramatically since then. The block subsidy has undergone four halvings, with the most recent occurring in April 2024, reducing the reward from 6.25 BTC to 3.125 BTC.
The coins had remained untouched for more than 16 years before becoming active on Sept. 5, 2026.
Independent on-chain tracker Lookonchain initially identified seven of the dormant wallets, representing 350 BTC, before the broader analysis expanded the tally to 12 rewards and 600 BTC.
Did the 600 BTC Belong to Satoshi Nakamoto?
There is currently no evidence that the 600 BTC belonged to Satoshi Nakamoto.
The timing is what sparked speculation.
The coins were mined in March 2010, when Nakamoto was still actively involved in Bitcoin’s development and communications. Consequently, movements from wallets dating to this period frequently attract speculation about whether they could be connected to Bitcoin’s creator.
But being “Satoshi-era Bitcoin” does not mean the Bitcoin belonged to Satoshi.
Whale Alert specifically said its research found no connection between any of the 12 blocks and Nakamoto.
That makes the more defensible description early-miner Bitcoin, rather than Satoshi’s Bitcoin.
You may also like: X Reportedly Eyes USDC as an Option for Paying Creators
Why the Satoshi Connection Is Difficult to Prove
Bitcoin’s blockchain provides a permanent record of transactions, but it does not automatically reveal the real-world identity controlling an address.
Researchers can examine transaction histories, mining patterns, and known address clusters to establish potential links. However, the mere fact that coins were mined in 2010 cannot establish that Nakamoto controlled them.
In this case, Whale Alert’s analysis specifically found no connection to Satoshi.
One of the 600 BTC Transfers May Have Been a Test
The sequence of transactions provides another interesting detail.
According to Whale Alert, one of the 50 BTC rewards moved several blocks before the majority of the remaining coins.
The tracking platform described the pattern as consistent with a possible test transaction, followed by the movement of the remaining holdings.
That could indicate that whoever controlled the wallets was taking a cautious approach when moving coins that had remained untouched since Bitcoin’s early days.
However, the blockchain cannot establish the owner’s intention.
The movement could represent:
- wallet consolidation;
- a change in custody;
- improved security arrangements;
- inheritance or estate management;
- preparation for a future sale; or
- another private transaction.
Could the 600 BTC Be Sold?
There is currently no evidence that the 600 BTC was sold.
This distinction is important for traders.
Moving Bitcoin from an old wallet to a new wallet does not necessarily mean the holder intends to sell.
Market observers would generally pay closer attention if the coins subsequently moved to known cryptocurrency exchange addresses, because that could indicate preparation for liquidation.
At the time of reporting, the significance of the transaction is therefore primarily historical and on-chain rather than proof of immediate selling pressure.
The 600 BTC is worth roughly $48 million at the valuation cited in current reports, but that amount remains relatively small compared with Bitcoin’s overall market and trading activity.
Why Old Bitcoin Wallets Keep Attracting Attention
Bitcoin’s earliest mining period represents a completely different era for the network.
In 2010, miners could participate using ordinary computers, Bitcoin’s mining difficulty was dramatically lower, and the network had only a fraction of today’s participants.
A miner who received a 50 BTC reward in that period and held it until today would have transformed what was then an almost negligible asset into millions of dollars.
The recent 600 BTC moved after 16 years is therefore significant not simply because of its dollar value, but because it provides a rare look at Bitcoin’s early monetary history.
It also demonstrates how transparent the network remains: anyone can independently inspect the relevant blockchain transactions and trace the movement of the coins.
What Happens Next?
The most important development to watch is where the 600 BTC goes next.
If the coins remain in newly created private wallets, the movement could simply represent a change in custody.
If substantial amounts eventually reach exchanges or other identifiable selling venues, market participants may interpret that differently.
For now, however, the evidence supports a much narrower conclusion:
A group of Bitcoin mining rewards from March 2010 has moved after more than 16 years of dormancy, but there is no established evidence connecting the coins to Satoshi Nakamoto.
The event is another reminder that Bitcoin’s earliest coins remain capable of generating enormous attention whenever they move.
